<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jon&#039;s Network &#187; Ultrasurf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonsnetwork.com/category/ultrasurf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonsnetwork.com</link>
	<description>Network Security News, Analysis and Ephemera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Astaro Now Blocks UltraSurf</title>
		<link>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/astaro-now-blocks-ultrasurf/</link>
		<comments>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/astaro-now-blocks-ultrasurf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astaro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bit9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall/UTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultrasurf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Filtering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonsnetwork.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astaro now blocks Ultrasurf with version 7.4. The need and difficulty of this task for schools are so great that Astaro issued a press release to announce the new feature. Apparently they are doing this using SSL inspection (outbound SSL proxy) as opposed to using application signatures. Outbound SSL proxies introduce a new range of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astaro now blocks Ultrasurf with version 7.4.  The need and difficulty of this task for schools are so great that <a href="http://www.astaro.com/newsroom/press_releases/astaro_7_4_defeats_ultrasurf">Astaro issued a press release</a> to announce the new feature.</p>

<p>Apparently they are doing this using SSL inspection (outbound SSL proxy) as opposed to using application signatures.  Outbound SSL proxies introduce a new range of hassles.  It would be better if they could detect the application (<a href="http://paloaltonetworks.com" title="Palo Alto Networks">ahem</a>) and block it that way:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The new filtering engine of Astaro&#8217;s version 7.4 also allows users to filter and control secure web traffic (HTTPS). With inferior web security solutions, users can circumvent the security policy simply by accessing sites over HTTPS, which encrypts the session between the client browser and the target destination. Astaro&#8217;s version 7.4 intercepts encrypted HTTPS traffic and examines the content for malware, stops spyware infections, and controls what types of sites can be accessed.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In addition to (instead of?) of blocking Ultrasurf at the network level, one could control such applications at the desktop level.  <a href="http://jonsnetwork.com/?p=372">Sophos does this</a> with panache.  Using a whitelisting program like <a href="http://www.bit9.com/">Bit9</a> or <a href="http://www.lumension.com/endpoint-security/application-whitelisting-software.jsp?rpLangCode=1&amp;rpMenuId=150828">Lumension</a> also turns this into a non-issue.  If there are other ways to solve this problem, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/astaro-now-blocks-ultrasurf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virustotal Ultrasurf Results</title>
		<link>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/virustotal-ultrasurf-results/</link>
		<comments>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/virustotal-ultrasurf-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endpoint Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultrasurf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonsnetwork.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you download UltraSurf 9.3, you get a file called u.exe. This file was submitted to Virustotal on 2/26/2009 and the results are here. Only 3 out of 38 companies identified Ultrasurf 9.3 as malware. Fortinet, Prevx1 and Quick Heal of India. Contrast that with this Virustotal scan of UltraSurf 8.8 from 3/13/2008 where 9 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you download <a href="http://ultrareach.com/">UltraSurf 9.3</a>, you get a file called <em>u.exe</em>.  This file was submitted to Virustotal on 2/26/2009 and the results are <a href="http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/d2d06a983007408ed2002e7e188e32ed">here</a>.  </p>

<p>Only 3 out of 38 companies identified Ultrasurf 9.3 as malware.  <a href="http://fortinet.com">Fortinet</a>, <a href="http://www.prevx.com/">Prevx1</a> and <a href="http://www.quickheal.co.in/">Quick Heal</a> of India.</p>

<p>Contrast that with this <a href="http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/5beaf4b94be56a26c0d5bd1ef4ed24cc">Virustotal scan of UltraSurf 8.8</a> from 3/13/2008 where 9 of 31 companies labeled the executable as malicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/virustotal-ultrasurf-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Block UltraSurf et al. with Sophos</title>
		<link>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/how-to-block-ultrasurf-et-al-with-sophos/</link>
		<comments>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/how-to-block-ultrasurf-et-al-with-sophos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sophos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultrasurf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPrism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonsnetwork.com/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blocking client-server applications like Ultrasurf at the network level can be a pain. Not so much if you have a firewall from Palo Alto Networks or a reasonably sophisticated URL filter like St. Bernard&#8217;s iPrism, but if you are constantly playing cat-and-mouse trying to block Ultrasurf et al. on your network you might see if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blocking client-server applications like Ultrasurf at the network level can be a pain.  Not so much if you have a firewall from <a href="http://paloaltonetworks.com">Palo Alto Networks</a> or a reasonably sophisticated URL filter like <a href="http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/01/st-bernard-iprism/">St. Bernard&#8217;s iPrism</a>, but if you are constantly playing cat-and-mouse trying to block Ultrasurf et al. on your network you might see if your endpoint security suite can do it for you.</p>

<p>Blocking these apps at the desktop is an elegant solution if you have the right product.  <a href="http://sophos.com">Sophos</a> does this well.  Their application control is baked into their endpoint security client and centrally managed from their enterprise console.  The applications will never get a chance to be accessed, installed, executed locally or remotely, e.g. a user cannot launch Ultrasurf from a thumbdrive if the machine has a Sophos client installed with the correct policy.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s how you set it up:</p>

<p>Click on the &#8220;Application Control&#8221; policy in Sophos Enterprise Console.</p>

<p><img class="center" src="http://jonsnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sophos-application-control.png" alt="sophos-application-control.png" width="436" height="274" /></p>

<p>Select &#8220;Proxy Application&#8221; (you could select &#8220;Security Tools&#8221;, &#8220;Remote Management&#8221; or many others)</p>

<p><img class="center" src="http://jonsnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sophos-proxy-application.png" alt="sophos-proxy-application.png" width="298" height="375" /></p>

<p>Click the arrows to move the apps to â€œBlockedâ€™â€™</p>

<p><img class="center" src="http://jonsnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sophos-blocked.png" alt="sophos-blocked.png" width="297" height="377" /></p>

<p>That&#8217;s it.  You then drag and drop this policy to the user groups you need to control.  The on-access AV engine blocks access at the code level.  If a user tries to run a blocked application from a thumb-drive, rename the file, download it, Sophos will block and report it.  </p>

<p><img class="center" src="http://jonsnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sophos-all-added.png" alt="sophos-all-added.png" width="297" height="377" /></p>

<p>You can also make a dynamic policy by blocking &#8220;All added by Sophos in the future&#8221;.  Any new app Sophos adds to the category will be blocked at your endpoints automatically.  <a href="http://www.sophos.com/security/analyses/controlled-applications/">Here are the applications Sophos has in their list.</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/free-trials/endpoint?id=www.bestnetworksecurity.com">30-Day Sophos Free Trial</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/02/how-to-block-ultrasurf-et-al-with-sophos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blocking Ultrasurf with a Sonicwall Application Firewall</title>
		<link>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/01/blocking-ultrasurf-with-a-sonicwall-application-firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/01/blocking-ultrasurf-with-a-sonicwall-application-firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewall/UTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palo Alto Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonicwall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultrasurf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Filtering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonsnetwork.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organizations under pressure to keep students and employees from bypassing internet filters using client technologies, like UltraSurf are in a perpetual game of cat and mouse. A network admin I know used these steps to block it on his Sonicwall: Ultrasurf uses &#8220;140300000101&#8243; for SSL ehlo messages. If you can block this signature with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organizations under pressure to keep students and employees from bypassing internet filters using client technologies, like <a href="http://www.ultrareach.com/">UltraSurf</a> are in a perpetual game of cat and mouse.  A network admin I know used these steps to block it on his Sonicwall:</p>

<p>Ultrasurf uses &#8220;140300000101&#8243; for SSL ehlo messages. If you can block this signature with the your firewall you can block ultrasurf. To do this follow these steps:</p>

<ol>
<li>Create a custom object in Firewall/Application Object section. Lets say the name of the object is &#8220;Ultra&#8221;</li>
<li>Application object type must be &#8220;Custom object&#8221;</li>
<li>Match Type must be &#8220;Exact Match&#8221;</li>
<li>Input Representation must be &#8220;Hexadecimal&#8221;</li>
<li>Then add Content &#8220;140300000101&#8243;</li>
</ol>

<p>Then go to Object Policy/Application Firewall Policy Settings:</p>

<ol>
<li>Policy name: write whatever you want</li>
<li>Policy type &#8220;Custom Policy&#8221;</li>
<li>Adress Source &#8220;Any&#8221;, Destionation &#8220;Any&#8221;</li>
<li>Service Source &#8220;Any&#8221;, Destionation &#8220;Any&#8221;</li>
<li>Exclusion Adrsss &#8220;None&#8221;</li>
<li>Application Object &#8220;Ultra Object&#8221; **Select the object which you write in the first section</li>
<li>Action &#8220;Reset/Drop&#8221;</li>
<li>Users/Group Included &#8220;All&#8221;, Excluded &#8220;None&#8221;</li>
<li>Schedule &#8220;Always On&#8221;</li>
<li>Enable loging &#8220;Check&#8221;</li>
<li>Redundancy Filters &#8220;Use Global settings checked&#8221;</li>
<li>Connection Side &#8220;Client Side&#8221;</li>
<li>Direction &#8220;Basic&#8221; Both</li>
</ol>

<p>Dont forget to enable the Application Firewall feature.  This is a bit easier to do on a Palo Alto firewall since the application is already identified natively by the box, you just have to block it in one of your  threat profile policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jonsnetwork.com/2009/01/blocking-ultrasurf-with-a-sonicwall-application-firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
